Skip to main content

Release It - Highlights Part 2

This is the second part of my collection of notes and snippets from Release It!


  • Low memory conditions are a threat to both stability and capacity.
  • You need to ask whether the possible keys are infinite or finite and would the items ever need to change?
  • The simplest cache clearing mechanism is time based.
  • Improper use of caching is the major cause of memory leaks, which turn into horrors like daily server restarts.
  • Your system should run for at least the typical deployment cycle. If you deploy once every two weeks, it should be able to run for at least two weeks without restart.
  • Limit the amount of memory a cache can use.
  • Caches that do not limit memory will eventually eat all memory.


  • Every integration point should have a test harness that can be substituted.
  • Make your test harness act like a hacker - try large payloads, invalid characters, injection and so on.
  • Have your test harness log requests so you can see what has caused problems.
  • Run longevity tests - tests that put impulse and stress upon a system over long periods of time.
  • Someone saying "the odds of that happening is millions to one" is actually quite likely to happen. Given a average site, making thousands of requests a day this is an easy target to hit.
  • Sessions are the Achilles heel of every application server.
  • Most testing uses the app in the way it was expected to be use such as load testing a site using the correct workflow. What about load testing without using cookies? Would this spawn a new session each time?


  • Whitespace costs! In HTML (or the markup generated) remove all whitespace. It costs time to generate and money to send across the wire. You could argue this is for big traffic sites only, but this technique is very simple to apply as part of the build and speeds up client side rendering.
  • Omit needless characters in HTML such as comments. Use server side commenting instead, this will be removed when processed.


  • Precompute as much of the page as possible. Use "punch outs" for dynamic content. For example Slashdot generates its page once and serves to thousands of users. All users get the page equally as fast. Caching would mean handfuls of users would get a slow experience.
  • Precomputed content should be deployed as part of the build. For more frequent updates another strategy or "content deploys" would be required.


  • The human visual system is an excellent pattern matching machine. Make logs readable by using a custom format. Scanning logs is very easy then.
  • Two line log files are difficult. Harder to grep. Keep everything on one line.
  • Each week review the systems tickets. Try to identify and fix problems as you go. Try and predict future problems where possible based on this info.
  • Check the logs daily for stack traces that are suspicious. These could be common errors that are bugs/problems that need fixing.


Popular posts from this blog

Constant Object Anti Pattern

Most constants are used to remove magic numbers or variables that lack context. A classic example would be code littered with the number 7. What does this refer to exactly? If this was replaced with DaysInWeek or similar, much clarity is provided. You can determine that code performing offsets would be adding days, rather than a mysterious number seven.Sadly a common pattern which uses constants is the use of a single constant file or object. The beauty of constants is clarity, and the obvious fact such variables are fixed. When a constant container is used, constants are simply lumped together. These can grow in size and often become a dumping ground for all values within the application.A disadvantage of this pattern is the actual value is hidden. While a friendly variable name is great, there will come a time where you will want to know the actual value. This forces you to navigate, if only to peek at the value within the constant object. A solution is to simple perform a refactor …

Three Steps to Code Quality via TDD

Common complaints and problems that I've both encountered and hear other developers raise when it comes to the practice of Test Driven Development are: Impossible to refactor without all the tests breakingMinor changes require hours of changes to test codeTest setup is huge, slow to write and difficult to understandThe use of test doubles (mocks, stubs and fakes is confusing)Over the next three posts I will demonstrate three easy steps that can resolve the problems above. In turn this will allow developers to gain one of the benefits that TDD promises - the ability to refactor your code mercifully in order to improve code quality.StepsStop Making Everything PublicLimit the Amount of Dependencies you Use A Unit is Not Always a Method or ClassCode quality is a tricky subject and highly subjective, however if you follow the three guidelines above you should have the ability to radically change implementation details and therefore improve code quality when needed.

DRY vs DAMP in Tests

In the previous post I mentioned that duplication in tests is not always bad. Sometimes duplication becomes a problem. Tests can become large or virtually identically excluding a few lines. Changes to these tests can take a while and increase the maintenance overhead. At this point, DRY violations need to be resolved.SolutionsTest HelpersA common solution is to extract common functionality into setup methods or other helper utilities. While this will remove and reduce duplication this can make tests a bit harder to read as the test is now split amongst unrelated components. There is a limit to how useful such extractions can help as each test may need to do something slightly differently.DAMP - Descriptive and Meaningful PhrasesDescriptive and Meaningful Phrases is the alter ego of DRY. DAMP tests often use the builder pattern to construct the System Under Test. This allows calls to be chained in a fluent API style, similar to the Page Object Pattern. Internally the implementation wil…