Skip to main content

Waste: Write Less Code

One of the biggest forms of waste is code. An estimated 80% of features in a software project are never or rarely used. This makes code the software development equivalent of inventory. Having a warehouse full of inventory is not a benefit, neither is having a repository full of code.

How to Have Less Code?

Delete it!

As much as you can within reason of course, tests must pass and features must still work. Deleting feels great when you can successfully remove some legacy code. You'll be surprised at what can be removed. Commented out code, unused classes and methods are the obvious first candidates.

Say No To Features by Default

Only add them if the benefit outweighs planning, designing, development, testing and maintenance costs combined. Even then, do you really need it? The advice here is do not listen to your customers regarding which features to add, instead listen to their problems.


Try and see if a library or framework can handle your use case. They may not be a perfect fit, but if isolated correctly the use of third party code can mean a massive reduction in code you need to write. You still need to maintain and configure third party code however.

Benefits of Less Code

  • Quicker to compile/parse.
  • Tests run quicker.
  • Easier on-boarding - less to understand and familiarise with.
  • Less chance of bugs - more code is more likely to have bugs.
  • Potential performance related problems should be reduced.

Remember - code is a liability. The job of software developer is not to write code, it is to solve problems. Sometimes this takes thousands of lines of code, other times it can take a simple conversation.


Popular posts from this blog

Constant Object Anti Pattern

Most constants are used to remove magic numbers or variables that lack context. A classic example would be code littered with the number 7. What does this refer to exactly? If this was replaced with DaysInWeek or similar, much clarity is provided. You can determine that code performing offsets would be adding days, rather than a mysterious number seven.Sadly a common pattern which uses constants is the use of a single constant file or object. The beauty of constants is clarity, and the obvious fact such variables are fixed. When a constant container is used, constants are simply lumped together. These can grow in size and often become a dumping ground for all values within the application.A disadvantage of this pattern is the actual value is hidden. While a friendly variable name is great, there will come a time where you will want to know the actual value. This forces you to navigate, if only to peek at the value within the constant object. A solution is to simple perform a refactor …

Three Steps to Code Quality via TDD

Common complaints and problems that I've both encountered and hear other developers raise when it comes to the practice of Test Driven Development are: Impossible to refactor without all the tests breakingMinor changes require hours of changes to test codeTest setup is huge, slow to write and difficult to understandThe use of test doubles (mocks, stubs and fakes is confusing)Over the next three posts I will demonstrate three easy steps that can resolve the problems above. In turn this will allow developers to gain one of the benefits that TDD promises - the ability to refactor your code mercifully in order to improve code quality.StepsStop Making Everything PublicLimit the Amount of Dependencies you Use A Unit is Not Always a Method or ClassCode quality is a tricky subject and highly subjective, however if you follow the three guidelines above you should have the ability to radically change implementation details and therefore improve code quality when needed.

DRY vs DAMP in Tests

In the previous post I mentioned that duplication in tests is not always bad. Sometimes duplication becomes a problem. Tests can become large or virtually identically excluding a few lines. Changes to these tests can take a while and increase the maintenance overhead. At this point, DRY violations need to be resolved.SolutionsTest HelpersA common solution is to extract common functionality into setup methods or other helper utilities. While this will remove and reduce duplication this can make tests a bit harder to read as the test is now split amongst unrelated components. There is a limit to how useful such extractions can help as each test may need to do something slightly differently.DAMP - Descriptive and Meaningful PhrasesDescriptive and Meaningful Phrases is the alter ego of DRY. DAMP tests often use the builder pattern to construct the System Under Test. This allows calls to be chained in a fluent API style, similar to the Page Object Pattern. Internally the implementation wil…